A project of World Bank Global Development Finance for the Control of Poverty in Developing Countries
Loading...
Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Journal of Humanities and Social Science (AJHSS) Volume 10, 2021
Abstract
Advancement help can't be apportioned simply on standards of selectivity. Pointers of good
monetary advancement are not strong and connection of these markers with destitution
mitigation isn't programmed; more accentuation should be given to reallocation
arrangements. Shifts in thinking and practice concerning aid have posed serious challenges in
monitoring and evaluation (M&E) for both donors and recipients, but progress in reform
remains slow. Advancement help as a level of absolute streams is declining and is
excessively little and wasteful to give adequate cradles to repeat worldwide emergencies.
This article presents a diagnostic checklist that captures issues of M&E policy of World
Bank. It applies Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) test, randomized controlled trials
and quasi-experimental designs to a review of the PRSP M&E arrangements of 10 aid dependent countries, which are recipient of World Bank Funds to demonstrate comparative
strengths and weaknesses.
Keywords: World Bank Funds, Monitoring and Evaluation, PRSP, Quasi-experimental
Designs, 10Aid-dependent Countries