A project of World Bank Global Development Finance for the Control of Poverty in Developing Countries
| dc.contributor.author | Mubarak Sulaiman Jamiu | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-06T12:53:03Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-11-06T12:53:03Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Advancement help can't be apportioned simply on standards of selectivity. Pointers of good monetary advancement are not strong and connection of these markers with destitution mitigation isn't programmed; more accentuation should be given to reallocation arrangements. Shifts in thinking and practice concerning aid have posed serious challenges in monitoring and evaluation (M&E) for both donors and recipients, but progress in reform remains slow. Advancement help as a level of absolute streams is declining and is excessively little and wasteful to give adequate cradles to repeat worldwide emergencies. This article presents a diagnostic checklist that captures issues of M&E policy of World Bank. It applies Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) test, randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs to a review of the PRSP M&E arrangements of 10 aid dependent countries, which are recipient of World Bank Funds to demonstrate comparative strengths and weaknesses. Keywords: World Bank Funds, Monitoring and Evaluation, PRSP, Quasi-experimental Designs, 10Aid-dependent Countries | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://kwasuspace.kwasu.edu.ng/handle/123456789/2686 | |
| dc.publisher | American Journal of Humanities and Social Science (AJHSS) Volume 10, 2021 | |
| dc.title | A project of World Bank Global Development Finance for the Control of Poverty in Developing Countries |