THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATIONS’ POLICY ON AGRICULTURE: PARAPHERNALIA OF NEOCOLONISATION OF AFRICAN ECONOMY

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorOlatoke, J.O., Adimula, R.A AKINTOYE OLARIYIKE DAMOLA and Balah, Mohammed Usman
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-11T09:53:00Z
dc.date.available2023-08-11T09:53:00Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The article examines the WTO policy on Agriculture. It places the policy in historical context, examines its underlining reasons and argues that the policy systematically favors farmers in developing countries. The policy through the open market system enables farmers in developing countries to increase their productivity. The article also evaluates the effect of WTO’s Agriculture policy on the indigenous agricultural programmes of the developing countries, and proposes reforms to provide developing countries with the tools to further promote the indigenous agricultural in African. Globalization has transformed the organization of international economic relationship around; it has affected the economic, social and political sphere of societies and citizens. This is characterized by complex set on interconnectivities and interdependence with an increasing number of actors vying to influence the outcome of these relationships. They lay competing claims to resources markets and legitimacy and are engaged in activities traditionally defined as belonging to the domain of diplomacy. The issue of market control, free trade and sovereignty in the international economy has been one of the major bones of contention in the activities of the world Trade Organization since its inception. Sovereign States remain the traditional subjects of international law, but in practice remain interdependent in the pursuit of their economic interest. It is trite international law. As the concept of sovereignty is a key element of public international law, international law is thus the regulatory law of international economy. Therefore, the power to do everything in a state i.e., to make law, to execute , to apply them, to impose and collect taxes and levy, contribution, to make war or peace to form treaties of alliance or of commerce with foreign nations and likes all are at the jurisdiction of international law. The major reason for the formation of the WTO was for a global effort to actualize the UN’s effort in a bid to roll back hindrance to free commerce through the painstaking intervention of the GATT through UNCTAD. However, in some quarters, it is now believed that the WTO’S emphasis has slipped from concentrating on these public interest goals to an organization formed to exploit the less developing countries economy. In nut shell, WTO is now seeing primarily as ‘an organization for liberalizing trade’ and help trade flow as freely as possible at the detriment of some member nations especially the African countries. Other writers from East Africa and Asian countries were also of the same opinion. To them, the WTO’S public interest and objectives remain out of reach of the Less Developed Nations. The antagonist of the WTO’s policies especially, agricultural policy argued that the organization is just a platform where the rich and developed countries are using to further colonise African trade. These groups also criticized the mode of reaching decision at the WTO otherwise called “consensus”, to them such mode was an imposition of ideas of some view developed nations over the developing ones. Thus, to them, the World Trade Organization is today one of the most secretive international bodies one earth, established to feed the greed of the rich in the name of trade liberalization. However, due to the recent development in the activities of the organization, i.e., the increase in the numbers of African members of the organization and the revisit to the agricultural policy of the organization during the 1995 New Zealand meeting, couple with the development that some of the African Countries are now experiencing via collaboration of Agricultural programmes with the aid of WTOs policy, one is tempted to ask, if actually, the agricultural policy of WTO is for the exploitation of African economy. In this regard, the paper evaluates the effect of the policy on the indigenous agricultural programmes of the developing countries, and takes a stand on its true position vis-à-vis the African economy.
dc.identifier.citationNIGERIAN JOURNAL OF FOOD, DRUG AND HEALTH LAW (NJFDHL) 5 (1) 24-30
dc.identifier.issn2006-6902
dc.identifier.urihttps://kwasuspace.kwasu.edu.ng/handle/123456789/894
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, Kogi State University, Anyigba
dc.relation.ispartofseries5 (1)
dc.titleTHE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATIONS’ POLICY ON AGRICULTURE: PARAPHERNALIA OF NEOCOLONISATION OF AFRICAN ECONOMY
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The World Trade Organisation Policy on Agriculture.pdf
Size:
5.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Scholarly Publication