Browsing by Author "Udende Patrick"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Assessment of the Use of Eyewitness Reports by Channels Television
    (Media and Communication Currents, 2024) Shaibu Agnes Joe; Udende Patrick
    Ethical concerns surrounding eyewitness materials from citizens often necessitate structured guidelines for integrating them into television productions. This study assessed Channels Television’s use of eyewitness reports in the Eyewitness Report programme. The objectives the study sought to achieve were to identify reasons for Channels Television‘s Eyewitness Report; to examine the mode of sourcing and utilising eyewitness reports; to examine procedures for making eyewitness reports conform to the station’s policies/ethical guidelines and to examine the mode of authenticating eyewitness materials from audience members. This was premised on the gatekeeping theory. The study adopted a qualitative research design, with the key informant interview method to garner insights from News and Current Affairs department personnel involved with the Eyewitness Report programme. A purposive sampling technique was used to select four key informants based on access, availability and knowledge of the subject. Data from the interviews were analysed thematically. The study found reasons behind the use of eyewitness reports to include that of addressing gaps in news coverage. In sourcing and utilising eyewitness reports, the programme actively engaged with the public through various platforms, emphasising credibility and quality checks Furthermore, the study uncovered that meticulous verification processes, follow-up and collaborative decision-making were employed in utilising citizen eyewitness reports. The study concluded that adherence to journalistic guidelines in the context of the Eyewitness Report demonstrates a commendable approach to incorporating citizen voices into the news agenda. The study therefore recommended that Channels Television provide clear guidelines for citizen contributors and communicate the same to the public in addition to its message soliciting eyewitness contributions.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparative Analysis of Public Officers’ Corruption Framing in Newspapers
    (Journal of Human Development and Communication, UNIMAP, 2018) Ahmed Kamaldeen Arikewuyo; Adisa Rasaq M.; Ahmad Fahmi Mahamood; Shuhairimi Abdullah; Udende Patrick; Nor’izah Ahmad; Abubakar Ibrahim; Maskor Bajuri; Ahmad Hizurrahman Rezuan
    This research was conducted to examine and compare the prevalence of public officials’ corruption frames in the online version among three popular Nigerian newspapers. Individual news article on public officials’ corruption was the unit of analysis while the reliability coefficients calculated using Holsti’s formula resulted to 90.0%. This study discovered that in the framing of 2016 public official corruption issues, the newspapers varied significantly with p= 0.002 and p= 0.000 respectively on corruption frames. However, the study, anchored on framing theory, identified economic consequence frames, the responsibility attributes, the treatment frames in the corruption issues. Further results revealed that the economic consequence frame identified financial losses with the total percentage of (63.8%). Nigerian government was framed as having highest responsibility for corruption eradication with the total percentage of (79.6%). Therefore, responsible government was recommended for treatment of corruption in Nigeria with the total percentage of (82.2%). While this study is focusing on the aspect of media frames, future researches can attempt to explore the area of audience frames where the study does not cover.